Skip to main content
AI

AI Agent Observability: Monitoring Production Agents Without Losing Sleep

When AI agents handle real business tasks autonomously, you need visibility into what they're doing and why. Here's how to build observability into your agent workflows without drowning in data.

Rod Hill·4 February 2026·6 min read

AI Agent Observability: Monitoring Production Agents Without Losing Sleep

You've deployed AI agents to handle customer inquiries, process documents, or orchestrate workflows. They're running autonomously, making decisions, taking actions.

Then someone asks: "What did the agent do with that customer request at 3am?"

If you can't answer that question confidently, you have an observability problem.

Why Agent Observability Is Different

Traditional application monitoring tracks requests, responses, and errors. AI agents are different:

  • Non-deterministic: The same input can produce different outputs
  • Chained reasoning: Agents make multiple decisions in sequence
  • Tool usage: Actions happen across multiple systems
  • Emergent behaviour: Complex interactions can produce unexpected results

You're not just monitoring an API — you're monitoring a decision-maker.

The Three Pillars of Agent Observability

1. Trace Everything

Every agent run should produce a trace — a complete record of:

  • Input context: What information did the agent receive?
  • Reasoning steps: What did it consider and decide?
  • Tool calls: What actions did it take, with what parameters?
  • Outputs: What was the final result?
  • Token usage: How much did this cost?
Run ID: run_abc123
User: "Schedule a meeting with John for next Tuesday"
├── Parse intent → schedule_meeting
├── Tool: calendar_check(user="john@company.com", date="2026-02-11")
│   └── Result: Available 10am-12pm, 2pm-4pm
├── Tool: calendar_create(title="Meeting with John", time="10:00")
│   └── Result: Created event_xyz789
└── Response: "Done! I've scheduled your meeting with John for Tuesday at 10am."

Tokens: 847 input, 156 output
Cost: $0.012
Duration: 2.3s

2. Define Success Metrics

What does "good" look like for your agents? Define metrics that matter:

Operational Metrics:

  • Task completion rate
  • Average response time
  • Error rate by type
  • Tool call success rate
  • Cost per task

Quality Metrics:

  • Human override rate (how often do humans correct the agent?)
  • Customer satisfaction scores
  • Accuracy on verifiable tasks
  • Escalation rate

Safety Metrics:

  • Guardrail trigger rate
  • Sensitive data access patterns
  • Anomalous behaviour detection

3. Alert on What Matters

Don't alert on everything — you'll get alert fatigue. Focus on:

Critical Alerts (wake someone up):

  • Agent attempted action outside permitted scope
  • Error rate spike above threshold
  • Cost anomaly (agent in a loop burning tokens)
  • Security-sensitive tool access patterns

Warning Alerts (review next business day):

  • Completion rate drop
  • New error types appearing
  • Latency degradation
  • Quality metric decline

Informational (weekly review):

  • Usage trends
  • Popular queries
  • Feature gaps (things users ask for that agent can't do)

Practical Implementation

Logging Strategy

Structure your logs for queryability:

{
  "run_id": "run_abc123",
  "timestamp": "2026-02-04T14:30:00Z",
  "agent": "customer-support",
  "user_id": "user_456",
  "input_hash": "sha256:...",
  "intent": "schedule_meeting",
  "tools_called": ["calendar_check", "calendar_create"],
  "tool_success": true,
  "output_type": "action_completed",
  "tokens_in": 847,
  "tokens_out": 156,
  "model": "claude-sonnet-4",
  "duration_ms": 2300,
  "cost_usd": 0.012,
  "guardrails_triggered": [],
  "human_override": false
}

Observability Stack Options

Full-featured platforms:

  • LangSmith (LangChain ecosystem) — traces, evaluation, monitoring
  • Arize Phoenix — open-source, great for debugging
  • Weights & Biases — experiment tracking with agent support
  • Datadog LLM Observability — enterprise integration

Lightweight approaches:

  • Structured logging + Grafana — works with existing infrastructure
  • OpenTelemetry — emerging standard for agent tracing
  • Custom dashboards — Metabase/Superset on your log data

The right choice depends on scale and existing infrastructure. Start simple, add sophistication as you learn what questions you need to answer.

Sampling and Cost Control

You don't need to store every token of every interaction forever.

Tiered storage:

  • Hot (30 days): Full traces, all data
  • Warm (90 days): Summarised traces, aggregated metrics
  • Cold (1 year+): Aggregated statistics only

Sampling strategies:

  • 100% of errors and anomalies
  • 100% of human-overridden runs
  • 10-20% sample of normal runs
  • Full traces for specific users/scenarios on demand

Debugging Agent Failures

When something goes wrong, you need to answer:

  1. What happened? (The trace)
  2. Why did it happen? (The context and reasoning)
  3. Is it happening to others? (Pattern analysis)
  4. How do we prevent it? (Root cause and fix)

Common Failure Patterns

Context confusion: Agent misinterpreted the user's intent

  • Fix: Improve prompt clarity, add confirmation for ambiguous requests

Tool failures: External system didn't respond as expected

  • Fix: Better error handling, retry logic, fallback tools

Reasoning loops: Agent got stuck in circular reasoning

  • Fix: Add loop detection, maximum iteration limits

Guardrail triggers: Agent tried something it shouldn't

  • Fix: Review if guardrail is correct or if agent needs better guidance

Cost runaways: Agent made excessive API calls

  • Fix: Budget limits, call rate monitoring, efficiency improvements

Building a Feedback Loop

Observability isn't just about catching problems — it's about continuous improvement.

Weekly review:

  • What were the most common user requests?
  • What did the agent fail to handle?
  • What did humans override?
  • What's the cost trend?

Monthly analysis:

  • Quality metric trends
  • New failure patterns
  • Feature gaps to address
  • Cost optimisation opportunities

Quarterly assessment:

  • Is the agent meeting business objectives?
  • What capabilities should we add?
  • Are we getting ROI?

Observability Without Surveillance

Remember: you're monitoring the agent, not the user. Design your observability to:

  • Minimise PII in logs — hash or tokenise identifiers
  • Set retention policies — don't keep data longer than needed
  • Control access — not everyone needs to see every trace
  • Be transparent — users should know their interactions are logged

Getting Started

If you're deploying agents without observability, start here:

  1. Today: Add structured logging to every agent run (run_id, intent, tools, success, cost)
  2. This week: Build a simple dashboard showing completion rate, error rate, cost
  3. This month: Add alerting for critical failures and cost anomalies
  4. This quarter: Implement quality metrics and feedback loops

You don't need a sophisticated MLOps platform on day one. A well-structured log that you actually look at beats an expensive platform that no one checks.

The Bottom Line

AI agents are powerful precisely because they operate autonomously. But autonomy without visibility is a risk. Good observability lets you:

  • Trust your agents with real work
  • Debug problems quickly when they occur
  • Improve performance continuously
  • Demonstrate value to stakeholders
  • Sleep at night

The goal isn't to watch every move — it's to have confidence that your agents are doing what you expect, and to know quickly when they're not.


Deploying AI agents and want to build confidence through observability? Get in touch — we help businesses monitor and improve their AI workflows.

Tags

AI AgentsObservabilityMonitoringProductionMLOpsDevOps
RH

Rod Hill

The Caversham Digital team brings 20+ years of hands-on experience across AI implementation, technology strategy, process automation, and digital transformation for UK businesses.

About the team →

Need help implementing this?

Start with a conversation about your specific challenges.

Talk to our AI →