AI Tool Registries and MCP Servers: Building the Ecosystem Your Agents Actually Need

Here's the dirty secret of AI agents in 2026: the model isn't the bottleneck. GPT-5, Claude, Gemini — they're all remarkably capable. The bottleneck is tooling. An AI agent that can think brilliantly but can't do anything is just an expensive chatbot.

The real competitive advantage isn't which model you use. It's what tools your agents can access and how seamlessly they connect.

The Tool Problem

Every business AI agent needs to interact with the real world: read emails, query databases, update CRMs, generate documents, send notifications, check calendars. Each integration requires custom code, authentication handling, error management, and ongoing maintenance.

A typical business might need their AI to connect to:

• Email (IMAP/SMTP or provider APIs)
• Calendar (Google Calendar, Microsoft 365)
• CRM (HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive)
• Accounting (Xero, QuickBooks, FreeAgent)
• Documents (Google Drive, SharePoint, Notion)
• Communication (Slack, Teams, WhatsApp)
• Project management (Asana, Linear, Monday)

Building bespoke integrations for each is expensive and fragile. When APIs change, everything breaks. When you switch providers, you rebuild from scratch.

Enter MCP: The Universal Tool Standard

The Model Context Protocol (MCP), originally introduced by Anthropic in late 2024, has evolved into something far more significant than anyone predicted. By early 2026, it's become the de facto standard for connecting AI agents to external tools and data sources.

MCP works like a universal adapter. Instead of building custom integrations for every AI model and every tool, you build an MCP server once. Any MCP-compatible AI agent can then discover and use that tool through a standardised protocol.

How MCP Servers Work

An MCP server exposes capabilities through a structured interface:

Tools — Actions the agent can take. "Send an email", "Create a calendar event", "Query the database". Each tool has a defined schema describing its inputs, outputs, and behaviour.

Resources — Data the agent can read. "Today's appointments", "Unread emails", "Current stock levels". Resources provide context without requiring the agent to take action.

Prompts — Templates that guide the agent's behaviour. "When summarising emails, include sender, subject, urgency level, and suggested action."

The beauty is standardisation. An agent doesn't need to know it's talking to HubSpot versus Salesforce. It just knows it has a "create contact" tool and a "list deals" resource. The MCP server handles the specifics.

Tool Registries: The App Store for AI Agents

If MCP servers are individual tools, tool registries are the catalogue. They solve the discovery problem: how does an AI agent (or the human configuring it) find the right tools for the job?

Public Registries

Several public registries have emerged:

• Smithery — curates and hosts MCP servers across categories (productivity, development, data, communication)
• MCP.so — community-driven directory of open-source MCP servers
• Glama — discovery platform with ratings, usage stats, and compatibility information
• Provider marketplaces — individual platforms (Notion, Linear, GitHub) publishing official MCP servers

These registries let you browse available tools, check compatibility with your AI setup, read reviews from other businesses, and deploy with minimal configuration.

Private Registries

For enterprises, private tool registries are becoming essential. They catalogue:

• Internal MCP servers built for proprietary systems
• Approved external tools vetted by IT security
• Custom configurations for standard tools (pre-configured with company credentials)
• Usage policies defining which agents can use which tools

A private registry acts as a governed layer between your AI agents and the tools available to them. IT controls what's in the registry; agents discover and use what's there.

Building Your Agent Tooling Stack

Step 1: Audit Your Integration Needs

List every system your AI agents need to interact with. Group them by:

• Frequency — how often does the agent need this tool?
• Criticality — what happens if the tool is unavailable?
• Complexity — how complex are the interactions?

Step 2: Check Existing MCP Servers

Before building anything, check the public registries. There's a good chance someone's already built what you need. Popular MCP servers exist for:

• Google Workspace (Gmail, Calendar, Drive)
• Microsoft 365 (Outlook, Teams, SharePoint)
• Slack
• GitHub
• PostgreSQL / MySQL databases
• Notion, Linear, Jira
• Stripe, Xero, QuickBooks
• File systems and S3 storage

Many are open source, well-maintained, and production-ready.

Step 3: Build Custom Servers for Proprietary Systems

For internal tools, legacy systems, or custom workflows, you'll need bespoke MCP servers. The good news: building one is significantly easier than building traditional API integrations.

An MCP server is essentially:

1. A tool definition (what it does, what inputs it needs)
2. A handler (the actual logic — usually just wrapping an existing API call)
3. Error handling and authentication

Most developers can build a basic MCP server in hours, not weeks. The standardised protocol means you don't need to design the interface — just implement the logic.

Step 4: Set Up Your Registry

For organisations with more than a handful of tools:

• Catalogue everything in a central registry (even a simple JSON file works initially)
• Document each tool's purpose, permissions, and limitations
• Define access policies — not every agent needs every tool
• Monitor usage — which tools are agents actually using?

Step 5: Implement Governance

Tool access is a security question. Your governance layer should address:

Authentication. How do tools authenticate? API keys, OAuth tokens, and service accounts each have different security properties. Centralise credential management.

Authorisation. Which agents can use which tools? A customer support agent shouldn't have access to financial tools. A reporting agent shouldn't be able to modify data.

Audit logging. Every tool invocation should be logged: who called what, when, with what parameters, and what result. This is essential for compliance and debugging.

Rate limiting. AI agents can be enthusiastic. Without rate limits, an agent might hammer an API endpoint thousands of times in minutes. Set sensible limits per tool, per agent, per time period.

The Composability Advantage

The real power of standardised tool registries isn't any single integration. It's composability. When every tool speaks the same protocol, agents can chain them together in ways you didn't anticipate.

Consider an invoicing workflow:

1. Agent reads an email with a purchase order (Email MCP server)
2. Looks up the customer in the CRM (CRM MCP server)
3. Checks current pricing (ERP MCP server)
4. Generates an invoice (Document MCP server)
5. Sends it for approval (Notification MCP server)
6. Records it in the accounting system (Accounting MCP server)

Each tool works independently. The agent orchestrates them together. When you swap your CRM from HubSpot to Salesforce, only the CRM MCP server changes — the workflow doesn't.

Cost and Maintenance Reality

A well-structured tool registry dramatically reduces ongoing costs:

Before MCP: Each integration is bespoke. When the AI model changes (GPT-4 to GPT-5, Claude 3 to Claude 4), every integration might need updating. When a tool API changes, the integration breaks. Maintenance scales linearly with the number of integrations.

After MCP: The protocol is stable. Model changes don't affect tool integrations. API changes only affect the specific MCP server. Maintenance is isolated and predictable.

For a typical UK SME with 10-15 business tools, the difference is meaningful: potentially 60-80% reduction in integration maintenance effort.

What's Coming Next

The tool registry ecosystem is evolving rapidly:

Dynamic tool discovery. Agents will browse registries in real time, finding and configuring new tools as needed — rather than having them pre-configured.

Tool composition standards. Beyond individual tools, standards for defining multi-tool workflows are emerging. Think of it as recipes that combine tools into complete business processes.

Federated registries. Businesses will share tool definitions across organisations while keeping credentials and data private. An industry consortium might maintain shared MCP servers for common regulatory tools.

Quality metrics. Registries will track reliability, response time, and accuracy for each tool — helping agents choose the best available option when alternatives exist.

Getting Started Today

1. Pick one workflow where your AI agents need tool access
2. Check public registries for existing MCP servers
3. Deploy a simple MCP server (start with file access or database queries)
4. Connect it to your AI agent and observe how it's used
5. Expand gradually — add tools as workflows demand them

The businesses that build their tooling infrastructure now will have a significant advantage as AI agents become more capable. The model improves automatically. The tooling is your competitive moat.

---

Ready to build your AI agent tooling stack? Contact us — we help UK businesses design and implement the infrastructure that makes AI agents genuinely productive.